I ended up with a Gamma 2.2 for various reasons among which are, that I only work for my own ink jet printer, not for a prepress room, that I use a PC, that it is closer to the Web's sRGB 6500K. The following procedure and setup produced the closest match till now, after a long quest: I use a Eizo screen, calibrated to approximately 5300K, which is the i1 measurement of a white balance card ("Grey Kard") in the 5000K JUST viewing booth, on my neutral gray desk, in a neutral gray painted dark room, with only a low 45 Lux glare free JUST 5000K indirect lighting. I even tried to ignore what I see, because it's not supposed to be there -) I have already difficulties with a view hundred Kelvin difference. I know that there are famous photographers who have eyes that, so they claim, are able to adapt between different white points while comparing an image on a screen calibrated for the Web (6500K, gamma 2.2, 80-120 cd/m2) to a 5000K viewing booth or even to a Solux 4700K or 3500K! Well, my eyes most definitely can't. The match is close, but not completely satisfying. Yes, matching my paper remains difficult even though I learned a lot, tried a lot and of course spent a lot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |